Javascript Menu by Deluxe-Menu.com
Executive Investigator
Tracking and Analyzing Executive Salaries, Bonuses, and Perks
# Monday, March 23, 2009
According to The New York Times, the Obama administration will offer a proposal this week that will "seek a broad new role for the Federal Reserve to oversee large companies, including major hedge funds, whose problems could pose risks to the entire financial system."

A part of this plan will supposedly require executive compensation to be more closely tied to the company's performance and financial interests, but no details have been announced.

If government officials comments so far are to be believed, this pay reform plan would not just apply to firms receiving bailout funds but all "large companies, including hedge funds, whose problems could pose risks to the entire financial system" - though once again there are no details yet on how this group would be defined.

Monday, March 23, 2009 5:51:16 PM UTC  #    Comments [6]  |  Trackback
# Wednesday, March 18, 2009
Despite most headlines correctly noting that Bank of America CEO Ken Lewis had his pay cut in half in 2008 compared to the year before, the 58% drop in his compensation was less severe than the drop in the company's stock price last year. Worse, Lewis still made $10 million in 2008 according to company filings (though the stock option awards are probably worthless right now).

Lewis' pay included:
  • $1.5 million in base salary
  • $4.3 million in stock awards
  • $3.1 million in stock option awards
  • $854,256 for the change in pension value and deferred compensation
  • "other expenses" of $275,125 - primarily the use of company aircraft and home security services

Wednesday, March 18, 2009 10:04:11 PM UTC  #    Comments [1]  |  Trackback
# Tuesday, March 03, 2009
Blackstone Group LP CEO Stephen Schwarzman, co-founder and chair of the company, did not receive any compensation last year other than his $350,000 base salary.

Schwarzman basically worked for free relative to the whopping $180 million he was paid in 2007 in addition to the $684 million he received when the company went public.

Blackstone shares lost 70% of their value last year, performing far worse than the major indexes.

Tuesday, March 03, 2009 1:48:57 PM UTC  #    Comments [0]  |  Trackback
# Monday, March 02, 2009
Fifth Third Bancorp CEO Kevin Kabat had his 2008 pay cut in half compared to 2007.

Though he still received $3.1 million in pay last year, he saw his compensation drop significantly from the $6.2 million he received in 2007.

Unfortunately for investors, the company's shares lost more of their value than his pay last. Fifth Third shares plummeted 67% in 2008. Also, Kabat's salary actually went up 4% in 2008.

From the Dayton Business Journal:

Kabat still received a salary of $900,000, up 4 percent from $867,000 in 2007. He also received $815,000 in stock awards and $1.2 million in stock options. His pay also included $26,589 in perks, including country club dues, parking fees and trust and estate planning services.

Monday, March 02, 2009 9:07:25 PM UTC  #    Comments [0]  |  Trackback
# Thursday, February 26, 2009
MBIA Inc., primarily a bond insurer, announced earlier this week that its board adopted a new shareholder voting policy for senior executive pay decisions.

From Forbes.com:

Shareholders will be able to vote on whether they approve of the compensation for the company's CEO - currently Jay Brown. The vote will be considered by the board's compensation committee in determining the CEO's compensation for subsequent periods.

Shareholders will also take an advisory vote on annual compensation awarded to senior executives as a whole.

Shareholders will be afforded the right to a third vote for any one-time compensation awards given to the CEO or other senior executive offices. Those votes on one-time awards will be binding.

Thursday, February 26, 2009 9:13:20 PM UTC  #    Comments [1]  |  Trackback
From the USA Today:

The profit at SunTrust Banks last year was half of what it was in 2007. The stock price was also cut in half, but the company's board of directors approved a 75% increase in the 2008 total compensation of CEO James Wells to $8.1 million, according to the SunTrust proxy filed late Monday with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Even better, though SunTrust is in much better shape than many other banks, it has also received some bailout money.

A company spokesperson responded by saying that the company's proxy statement overstates the value of Wells' compensation because of the vast drop since then in SunTrust's stock price - which is true but doesn't explain the 7.7% increase in Wells' cash salary in 2008.

Thursday, February 26, 2009 3:00:57 AM UTC  #    Comments [1]  |  Trackback
# Monday, February 23, 2009
Whether you love or hate the structure of America's tax code, the simple fact is it often benefits already handsomely paid executives relative to normal 9-to-5 employees.

As the Christian Science Monitor reports:

The current top tax rate on "ordinary" work income sits at 35 percent. But dividends and capital gains from the buying and selling of most assets face only a 15 percent top rate. That's why in 2006, America's top 400 paid just 17.2 percent of their $263 million average incomes in federal tax.

Millions of middle-class American families, once you tally income and payroll taxes, pay far more of their incomes in tax. One particularly striking example from billionaire investor Warren Buffett: In 2006, he paid 17.7 percent of his income in total taxes. His secretary, who made $60,000, paid 30 percent of hers.

When an executive receives outrageous, undeserved stock compensation, they not only take advantage of their shareholders but often times they also take advantage of every normal taxpayer too.

(It is important to note that not all stock options, for instance, skirt normal income tax rates. Nonqualified stock options require the exerciser to claim the difference between the strike price and the market price as income.)

Monday, February 23, 2009 6:54:06 PM UTC  #    Comments [1]  |  Trackback
# Wednesday, February 18, 2009
The Associated Press is reporting that General Electric's CEO and Chairman Jeffrey Immelt declined his "long-term performance award," valued at $11.7 million, for 2008.

Given that GE shares have lost nearly 70% of their value over the last 12 months, Immelt is right to forgo his bonus - but the real question is why he is even eligible for a bonus?

I am not suggesting companies should be held hostage by stock market price swings - but GE is facing a real crisis not simply a downturn in its business cycle.

Wednesday, February 18, 2009 4:17:43 PM UTC  #    Comments [0]  |  Trackback
# Wednesday, February 11, 2009
Bloomberg is reporting that "Citigroup Inc. Chief Executive Officer Vikram Pandit said, [while testifying before the U.S. House Financial Services Committee], he will take a salary of $1 and no bonus until the bank, which has accepted $45 billion in government bailout money, returns to profitability."

Wednesday, February 11, 2009 7:46:19 PM UTC  #    Comments [90]  |  Trackback