Javascript Menu by Deluxe-Menu.com
Executive Investigator
Tracking and Analyzing Executive Salaries, Bonuses, and Perks
 Friday, January 05, 2007
Home Depot's ex-CEO Robert Nardelli has become a media target after he resigned, revealing his 'golden parachute' amounting to over $210 million. This pay came in addition to his existing $300 million in compensation, which he received during the course of his tenure at the Home Depot. Meanwhile, shareholders suffered through sub par performance when compared to Lowe's (Home Depot's main competitor). Most investors fail to realize that this type of compensation is actually quite common in corporate America. Here are a few of the most notable instances of over-compensation in the past:

Pfizer's Henry McKinnell left the company with a $213 million pay package with an $83 million pension. This came despite shareholder losses amounting to over $137 billion during his tenure. Sovereign Bank's Jay Sidu left the company with over $44 million after being removed via a long proxy battle with shareholders. Many other CEOs were removed from their posts with tens of millions of dollars of compensation, from companies like Morgan Stanley (Philip Purcell), Viacom (Tom Fretson), and Hewitt-Packard (Carly Fiorina).

While there are many highly paid CEOs that deserve the pay they receive, there are countless others that profit handsomely while shareholders suffer through losses. While new executive compensation disclosure rules should help increase transparency, there is still a lot of work left to do before we see executive interests truly aligned with shareholder interests.

Friday, January 05, 2007 6:28:53 AM UTC  #    Comments [0]  |  Trackback
 Wednesday, January 03, 2007
The Home Depot, Inc. (NYSE:HD) surprised investors today when CEO Robert Nardelli announced his "mutually-agreed" resignation. The news comes after shareholders expressed concern with the company's lackluster performance and excessive executive compensation. Happiness over his resignation was quickly quelled, however, when investors discovered his $210 million golden parachute that came in addition to his already excessive $300 million in compensation during his tenure. The future also remains uncertain for shareholders, as the board and company plans remain intact. Leading the shareholder rebellion to institute real change is Relational Investors - an activist hedge fund that is now reportedly considering a proxy battle in order to institute change. Whether or not this takes place remains uncertain; however, the battle for shareholders is only beginning at the Home Depot.

View Nardelli's Compensation

Wednesday, January 03, 2007 1:08:28 AM UTC  #    Comments [0]  |  Trackback
 Friday, December 29, 2006
Apple Computer, Inc. (NDAQ:AAPL) released its 10-K annual report today after delaying it while the company investigated irregularities with the company's stock option grants. In the explanatory note in the beginning of the filing, Apple noted that while the company would face an $84 million charge related to the stock option grants, Steve Jobs and other senior executives would not involved in the scandal. Al Gore, chair of the special committee, said, "The board of directors is confident that the company has corrected the problems that led to the restatement, and it has complete confidence in Steve Jobs and the senior management team". The company found that while Jobs was aware of, or recommended the selection of, some favorable grant dates, he neither benefited financially from them nor "appreciated the accounting implications" of his actions. Consequently, Steve Jobs' and other executives appear to be safe, and the company's stock has rebounded 5% in today's trading.

Friday, December 29, 2006 8:20:25 PM UTC  #    Comments [0]  |  Trackback
 Thursday, December 28, 2006
Comstock Resources, Inc. (NYSE:CRK) CEO Jay M. Allison exercised 45,000 options yesterday in a transaction worth over $1.39 million. According to the form 4 filing with the SEC, Allison exercised the 45,000 options at $3.88 per share and then immediately sold them at $31.32. The filing also noted that he gave away 25,000 shares as a gift. Comstock's stock has been on a bull run since October, rising from $26 to $33 before retracing slightly over the past few sessions. Sometimes insider selling is seen as a lack of confidence in management; however, in many cases it is simply timely portfolio diversification for executives.

Comstock Resources, Inc. (Comstock) is engaged in the acquisition, development, production and exploration of oil and natural gas. The Company's oil and natural gas operations are concentrated in the east Texas/north Louisiana, southeast Texas, south Texas and Mississippi regions. In addition, the Company has properties in other regions in Arkansas, Kansas, Kentucky, New Mexico and Oklahoma. The Company owns 48% of Bois d'Arc Energy, Inc., which conducts exploration, development and production operations in state and federal waters of the Gulf of Mexico.

Related Companies
Apache Corporation (NYSE:APA)
Hydrodynamics Corporation (NYSE:HDY)
GSV, Inc. (OTC:GTVI)

Thursday, December 28, 2006 11:34:11 PM UTC  #    Comments [0]  |  Trackback
 Wednesday, December 27, 2006
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission caused some controversy yesterday after it reversed an earlier decision to force executives to disclose the face value of stock grants as they are given to executives. This rule is one of many that came as the result of an executive compensation overhaul earlier this year. Specifically, this new change, going into effect immediately, allows companies to disclose only the portions of the stock grants that are usable by executives. This allows companies to dispense stock grants to executives that will not be disclosed to investors until they are exercisable. While many people have criticized this move, SEC Chairman Christopher Cox insisted that this rule was actually what the commission intended when it first adopted its new executive compensation policies. The only two major problems seen with the new rule were policies dealing with retirement and resignations. When executives retire, their stock grants are immediately expensed at full value. This means that those retiring executives may appear overcompensated, when in fact they are on par with others. Meanwhile, if an executive leaves a company before the full value of their options vest, then the full amount would be reported when there was actually nothing received. While the SEC noted these problems, they argued that these new policies needed to be pushed out before early 2007, when many companies will be reporting under the new regulations.

Wednesday, December 27, 2006 10:16:45 AM UTC  #    Comments [0]  |  Trackback
 Friday, December 22, 2006
Pfizer, Inc. (NYSE:PFE) revealed today in an 8-K filing with the SEC that its former CEO, Henry A. McKinnel, could receive more than $180 million in retirement benefits after he leaves the company in February. This news comes shortly after the ex-CEO was forced into early retirement in part due to investor concern over his excessive compensation benefits. These benefits include $13,278,518 in supplemental savings; $41,769,089 worth of deferred performance-contigent shares; $22,862,334 in deferred bonuses; and, a lump sum pension totaling $82,305,823. While the executive has served the company for 35-years, investors have been critical of executive compensation as the stock's price has suffered in recent months.

Friday, December 22, 2006 4:57:30 AM UTC  #    Comments [0]  |  Trackback
 Tuesday, December 19, 2006
Home Depot (NYSE:HD) may find itself in more trouble soon after Relational Investors announced that it wants an independent committee appointed by the board to evaluate the company's management and direction. This move comes after the company has already faced widespread criticism for its executive compensation policies and subpar stock price. According to the letter to management:
"We believe the Company's board of directors is presented with enormous responsibility and opportunity to reverse the Company's chronic inferior stock price performance experienced since 2000. We attribute this performance to deficient strategy, operations, capital allocation, and governance.

We are planning an advocacy program designed to spur positive action to address these deficiencies. In that vain, under separate cover we have submitted the attached Notice of Shareholder Proposal. This notice was timed to satisfy the deadlines set forth in the Company's Bylaws.

We would like to meet with you and representatives of the Company's board of directors at the earliest convenient time. At that meeting, we would like to discuss this proposal and other steps we are considering, which include nominating one or more directors for election to the Company's board of directors at the Company's 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders." (Read More)
The company immediately rejected the request, however, in it's response:
"The Home Depot(R), the world's largest home improvement retailer, announced that it has received notice from Relational Investors, LLC, an investment firm, that Relational intends to submit a proposal at the next annual meeting of shareholders of The Home Depot. The proposal will request that the board of directors of The Home Depot appoint a special committee of independent directors to evaluate the strategic direction of the Company, the performance of management and strategic alternatives for the
Company. Relational notified the Company that this proposal is part of an "advocacy program" planned by Relational with respect to the Company, that Relational plans to solicit proxies to have its proposal adopted, and that Relational may nominate one or more directors for election at the 2007 annual meeting. In addition, Relational has requested a meeting with The Home Depot's chief executive officer, Bob Nardelli, and members of the Company's board of directors.

The Company said that its board of directors recently completed a strategic review and that it will oppose the resolution and proxy solicitation that Relational intends to pursue.

The Company also said today that its board of directors unanimously supports the management team and its plan to continue enhancing value for all shareholders through the execution of its current strategy. During the past six years, the Company has delivered strong financial results. Sales at The Home
Depot have nearly doubled, from $45.7 billion in 2000 to $81.5 billion in 2005, and earnings per share have increased more than 140 percent in the same period. From 2001 to the present, the Company has invested more than $29 billion back into the business, through capital and acquisition spending, while also returning over $20 billion to shareholders in the form of share repurchases and dividends, including two dividend increases of 50 percent each this year. This includes, most recently, issuing $5 billion in debt and announcing a $3 billion accelerated share repurchase. Since 2002, when the Company's share repurchase program began, The Home Depot has repurchased approximately 450 million shares, or 19 percent of its outstanding shares. This demonstrates the Company's balanced approach to capital allocation through business investments and cash returned to its shareholders.

The Home Depot has advised Relational that it will arrange a meeting shortly after the first of the year to discuss its concerns, consistent with The Home Depot's policy of engaging in an open and direct dialogue with shareholders.

Relational indicated in its notice that it has recently become a shareholder of The Home Depot. Relational further indicated that its various affiliates own approximately 12,966,338 shares of The Home Depot's common stock, or roughly 0.6 percent of the common shares outstanding. The Home Depot's correspondence with Relational is attached." (Read More)
In an interview with the Associated Press, Relational Investors manager Whitworth, said: "There is no accountability to shareholders. Since Nardelli was made president in 2000, he’s taken hundreds of millions in compensation, but the company’s return to investors has been almost nothing. There needs to be someone making sure management is watching the store." And it's true, while the CEO has received $240 million in compensation this year, the company's stock rose merely 3%. Moreover, the company's main competitor, Lowe's, increased over 170% during the same time period! Clearly change is needed here and Relational Investors may be the best bet for investors.

Tuesday, December 19, 2006 7:15:20 AM UTC  #    Comments [0]  |  Trackback
 Friday, December 15, 2006
Speedway Motors Inc. CEO Burton Smith has recently received some press coverage by the AP over his questionable bonuses, disclosed in a December 5th 8-K filing with the SEC. According to the filing, Mr. Smith is entitled to receive a $1.45 million bonus in part for his "reduction of debt" to the company. Even more troubling is the fact that this "performance" metric has been used for determining Mr. Smith's bonuses for the past several years!

But just how much debt are we talking? Well according to a recent 10-Q filing with the SEC:
"Notes and other receivables from affiliates at September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 include $939,000 and $1,906,000 due from the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. The amount due represents premiums paid by the Company under a split-dollar life insurance trust arrangement on behalf of the Chairman, cash advances and expenses paid by the Company on behalf of the Chairman before July 30, 2002 and accrued interest. The Board of Directors, including SMI’s independent directors, have reviewed this compensatory arrangement and determined it an appropriate use of available Company funds based on interest rates at the time of transaction and creditworthiness of the Chairman. As of July 30, 2002, the Company indicated to the Chairman that it would no longer make payments under the split-dollar life insurance trust arrangements or advances for his benefit."
How are companies allowed to do this? Well, the practice is now actually illegal - the relatively new Sarbanes-Oxley law (that took effect in 2002) now prohibits public companies from extending new loans to their executives. Meanwhile, experts agree that this type of behavior goes against the notion of performance-based bonuses. Moreover, the company is essentially rewarding the executive twice - once by lending the money and again by rewarding him for repayment. Meanwhile, the company argued that under increased scrutiny, they simply wanted to encourage the executive to pay off his outstanding debts. In reality, it may have attracted even more scrutiny...

Friday, December 15, 2006 3:35:32 AM UTC  #    Comments [0]  |  Trackback