<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:pingback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/pingback/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Executive Investigator</title>
    <link>http://blog.executivedisclosure.com/</link>
    <description>Tracking and Analyzing Executive Salaries, Bonuses, and Perks</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Accelerize New Media Inc. (OTC-BB: ACLZ)</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 14:07:36 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>newtelligence dasBlog 2.0.7226.0</generator>
    <managingEditor>editor@executiveinvestigator.com</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>editor@executiveinvestigator.com</webMaster>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.executivedisclosure.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=5ae91bb1-0a66-49fa-a68b-1fcb3e35cebb</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.executivedisclosure.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.executivedisclosure.com/PermaLink,guid,5ae91bb1-0a66-49fa-a68b-1fcb3e35cebb.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>ExecutiveInvestigator.com</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.executivedisclosure.com/CommentView,guid,5ae91bb1-0a66-49fa-a68b-1fcb3e35cebb.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.executivedisclosure.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=5ae91bb1-0a66-49fa-a68b-1fcb3e35cebb</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <a href="http://faireconomy.org/files/executive_excess_2008.pdf">Executive
Excess 2008</a> also looks at the pay of fund managers - which is usually ignored
in general discussions of rising pay because such managers are not heads of publicly
traded companies so many arguments levied against them do not apply. However, through
the lens of beneficial tax treatment, fund managers may be <i>more</i>, not less,
guilty. Here are the top 5 fund managers by pay in 2007 (no, these billion dollar
numbers are not typos):<br /><br /><div align="right">John Paulson, Paulson &amp; Co.: <b>$3.7 billion</b><br />
George Soros, Soros Fund Management: <b>$2.9 billion</b><br />
James Simons, Renaissance Technologies: <b>$2.8 billion</b><br />
Philip Falcone, Harbinger Partners: <b>$1.7 billion</b><br />
Kenneth Griffin, Citadel Investment Group: <b>$1.5 billion</b><br /></div><p></p><img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.executivedisclosure.com/aggbug.ashx?id=5ae91bb1-0a66-49fa-a68b-1fcb3e35cebb" /></body>
      <title>You thought CEOs were well paid</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.executivedisclosure.com/PermaLink,guid,5ae91bb1-0a66-49fa-a68b-1fcb3e35cebb.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.executivedisclosure.com/2008/08/27/You+Thought+CEOs+Were+Well+Paid.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 14:07:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;a href="http://faireconomy.org/files/executive_excess_2008.pdf"&gt;Executive Excess
2008&lt;/a&gt; also looks at the pay of fund managers - which is usually ignored in general
discussions of rising pay because such managers are not heads of publicly traded companies
so many arguments levied against them do not apply. However, through the lens of beneficial
tax treatment, fund managers may be &lt;i&gt;more&lt;/i&gt;, not less, guilty. Here are the top
5 fund managers by pay in 2007 (no, these billion dollar numbers are not typos):&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;div align="right"&gt;John Paulson, Paulson &amp;amp; Co.: &lt;b&gt;$3.7 billion&lt;/b&gt; 
&lt;br&gt;
George Soros, Soros Fund Management: &lt;b&gt;$2.9 billion&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
James Simons, Renaissance Technologies: &lt;b&gt;$2.8 billion&lt;/b&gt; 
&lt;br&gt;
Philip Falcone, Harbinger Partners: &lt;b&gt;$1.7 billion&lt;/b&gt; 
&lt;br&gt;
Kenneth Griffin, Citadel Investment Group: &lt;b&gt;$1.5 billion&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.executivedisclosure.com/aggbug.ashx?id=5ae91bb1-0a66-49fa-a68b-1fcb3e35cebb" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.executivedisclosure.com/CommentView,guid,5ae91bb1-0a66-49fa-a68b-1fcb3e35cebb.aspx</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.executivedisclosure.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=bbc4600d-72c1-4bc4-a2bf-8081002f9040</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.executivedisclosure.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.executivedisclosure.com/PermaLink,guid,bbc4600d-72c1-4bc4-a2bf-8081002f9040.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>ExecutiveInvestigator.com</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.executivedisclosure.com/CommentView,guid,bbc4600d-72c1-4bc4-a2bf-8081002f9040.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.executivedisclosure.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=bbc4600d-72c1-4bc4-a2bf-8081002f9040</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">As promised, the beginning of an extensive
look at the Institute for Policy Studies and United for a Fair Economy's 15th annual
CEO Compensation Survey, this year titled "<a href="http://faireconomy.org/files/executive_excess_2008.pdf">Executive
Excess 2008: How Average Taxpayers Subsidize Runaway Pay</a>."<br /><br /><b>Key Findings</b><br /><br />
CEO-WORKER DIVIDE: S&amp;P 500 CEOs last year averaged $10.5 million, 344 times the
pay of typical American workers. Last year, the top 50 hedge and private equity fund
managers averaged $588 million each, more than 19,000 times as much as typical U.S.
workers earned.<br /><br />
TAXPAYER SUBSIDIES FOR EXECUTIVE PAY: Average U.S. taxpayers subsidize excessive executive
compensation — by more than $20 billion per year — via a variety of tax and accounting
loopholes.<br /><br />
INDIRECT TAXPAYER SUPPORT FOR RUNAWAY PAY: More than 85 percent of the public companies
on the federal government’s top 100 contractors list paid their CEOs over 100 times
the pay of average U.S. workers.<br /><br />
REFORM ROADBLOCKS: Legislation that would plug executive-friendly tax loopholes is
already pending in Congress. But this legislation has stalled — and will likely remain
stalled unless the November 2008 elections change current Congressional voting dynamics.<br /><p></p><img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.executivedisclosure.com/aggbug.ashx?id=bbc4600d-72c1-4bc4-a2bf-8081002f9040" /></body>
      <title>Executive Excess Overview</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.executivedisclosure.com/PermaLink,guid,bbc4600d-72c1-4bc4-a2bf-8081002f9040.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.executivedisclosure.com/2008/08/26/Executive+Excess+Overview.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 15:01:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>As promised, the beginning of an extensive look at the Institute for Policy Studies and United for a Fair Economy's 15th annual CEO Compensation Survey, this year titled "&lt;a href="http://faireconomy.org/files/executive_excess_2008.pdf"&gt;Executive
Excess 2008: How Average Taxpayers Subsidize Runaway Pay&lt;/a&gt;."&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Key Findings&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
CEO-WORKER DIVIDE: S&amp;amp;P 500 CEOs last year averaged $10.5 million, 344 times the
pay of typical American workers. Last year, the top 50 hedge and private equity fund
managers averaged $588 million each, more than 19,000 times as much as typical U.S.
workers earned.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
TAXPAYER SUBSIDIES FOR EXECUTIVE PAY: Average U.S. taxpayers subsidize excessive executive
compensation — by more than $20 billion per year — via a variety of tax and accounting
loopholes.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
INDIRECT TAXPAYER SUPPORT FOR RUNAWAY PAY: More than 85 percent of the public companies
on the federal government’s top 100 contractors list paid their CEOs over 100 times
the pay of average U.S. workers.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
REFORM ROADBLOCKS: Legislation that would plug executive-friendly tax loopholes is
already pending in Congress. But this legislation has stalled — and will likely remain
stalled unless the November 2008 elections change current Congressional voting dynamics.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.executivedisclosure.com/aggbug.ashx?id=bbc4600d-72c1-4bc4-a2bf-8081002f9040" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.executivedisclosure.com/CommentView,guid,bbc4600d-72c1-4bc4-a2bf-8081002f9040.aspx</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.executivedisclosure.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=bbca4bd9-d6db-4bf0-9a40-743c415a7a3f</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.executivedisclosure.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.executivedisclosure.com/PermaLink,guid,bbca4bd9-d6db-4bf0-9a40-743c415a7a3f.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>ExecutiveInvestigator.com</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.executivedisclosure.com/CommentView,guid,bbca4bd9-d6db-4bf0-9a40-743c415a7a3f.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.executivedisclosure.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=bbca4bd9-d6db-4bf0-9a40-743c415a7a3f</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/2008/0825/p16s01-wmgn.html">The
Christian Science Monitor</a> takes a broad look at the executive compensation issue:<br /><br /><b>How much?</b><br /><br />
Some 77 percent of Americans polled last year felt that corporate executives "earn
too much." Most corporate boards apparently disagree. Last year, although the nation's
economy was already in trouble, they gave the chief executive officers of the Standard
&amp; Poor's 500 largest companies on average a 2.6 percent pay hike to $10,544,470.<br /><br /><b>Why no action?</b><br /><br /><p>
On the presidential campaign trail, both Sens. Barack Obama and John McCain attack
the high levels of pay for corporate bosses, but are mostly fuzzy on remedies. Several
bills before Congress would attempt to tame runaway executive pay. But none have passed
both houses. 
</p><p>
Politicians are "looking out" to protect the campaign contributions they receive from
corporate executives, says Ms. Anderson. And it's an election year. 
<br /></p><p><b>Are they worth the money?</b></p><p>
A new study by economists Ulrike Malmendier at the University of California, Berkeley,
and Geoffrey Tate at the UCLA Anderson School of Management, Los Angeles, cast some
doubt for some "CEO superstars." After gaining fame and prestigious awards from business
magazines and others for their corporate performance, they are rewarded with even
more pay. But in the next three years their firms underperform by 15 to 20 percent
compared with firms of non-prize-winning executives. 
</p><p>
Ms. Malmendier suspects the CEOs are too busy writing books, sitting on other company
boards, taking prestigious public service jobs, and improving their golf handicaps. 
</p><p></p><img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.executivedisclosure.com/aggbug.ashx?id=bbca4bd9-d6db-4bf0-9a40-743c415a7a3f" /></body>
      <title>CEO Pay Issue Basics</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.executivedisclosure.com/PermaLink,guid,bbca4bd9-d6db-4bf0-9a40-743c415a7a3f.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.executivedisclosure.com/2008/08/25/CEO+Pay+Issue+Basics.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 15:07:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/2008/0825/p16s01-wmgn.html"&gt;The Christian Science
Monitor&lt;/a&gt; takes a broad look at the executive compensation issue:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;b&gt;How much?&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Some 77 percent of Americans polled last year felt that corporate executives "earn
too much." Most corporate boards apparently disagree. Last year, although the nation's
economy was already in trouble, they gave the chief executive officers of the Standard
&amp;amp; Poor's 500 largest companies on average a 2.6 percent pay hike to $10,544,470.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Why no action?&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
On the presidential campaign trail, both Sens. Barack Obama and John McCain attack
the high levels of pay for corporate bosses, but are mostly fuzzy on remedies. Several
bills before Congress would attempt to tame runaway executive pay. But none have passed
both houses. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Politicians are "looking out" to protect the campaign contributions they receive from
corporate executives, says Ms. Anderson. And it's an election year. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Are they worth the money?&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
A new study by economists Ulrike Malmendier at the University of California, Berkeley,
and Geoffrey Tate at the UCLA Anderson School of Management, Los Angeles, cast some
doubt for some "CEO superstars." After gaining fame and prestigious awards from business
magazines and others for their corporate performance, they are rewarded with even
more pay. But in the next three years their firms underperform by 15 to 20 percent
compared with firms of non-prize-winning executives. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Ms. Malmendier suspects the CEOs are too busy writing books, sitting on other company
boards, taking prestigious public service jobs, and improving their golf handicaps. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.executivedisclosure.com/aggbug.ashx?id=bbca4bd9-d6db-4bf0-9a40-743c415a7a3f" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.executivedisclosure.com/CommentView,guid,bbca4bd9-d6db-4bf0-9a40-743c415a7a3f.aspx</comments>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>