Do you see any relationship between board composition and excessive executive compensation? I have noticed that many of the boards have been loaded up with fellow CEOs, fellow members of the club. For example, GE has a total of seven external CEO's (i.e., in addition to GE CEO Immelt) serving on the board. (I include in this group one individual who is President of MIT). Isn't it in their best interest to keep executive compensation at a high level, regardless of performance?

At GE, the seven managers for whom executive compensation was detailed in the annual report received a total of more than $115 million, combined, in 2008, even though net earnings declined.

Good post.

Hi everyone. All men are frauds. The only difference between them is that some admit it. I myself deny it. Help me! I can not find sites on the: drug rehab treatment centers in. I found only this - <a href="http://design.ru-deluxe.ru/">photoshop risuem krov'</a>. Doses of bz and adequate control of. Come to desert canyon drug and alcohol addiction treatment center and let us help you overcome drug or alcohol related problems, start rehabilitation today. With respect :-(, Phila from Guinea-Bissau.

High compensation = lack of true competition
Like what car sales or electronic sales were before on-line sales and pricing info
= controlled markets
= club mentality
= no prison terms for all levels selling crap
= use car sales persons also get bonuses
The “sin” in business

snbgFD <a href="http://uaffaixbjyqt.com/">uaffaixbjyqt</a>, [url=http://brxhzokbsesd.com/]brxhzokbsesd[/url], [link=http://kfmobzhesxjd.com/]kfmobzhesxjd[/link], http://jimpognxzppt.com/